AVATAR

Talk about the good and bad in film & television.

Moderators: AgentHelix, TheRonin, Tracy Fran, Captain Genius

Postby EddieH » Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:45 am

And it's OK to think that Elliotanimated. The movie didn't touch you like it did other people. We are all different ;)
EddieH
 
Posts: 986
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 2:21 pm
Location: San Diego

Postby Elliotanimated » Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:48 am

At the risk of sounding argumentative (which I sure don't intend), can you point out 3 new and original things in the film?
Elliotanimated
 
Posts: 3612
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: London, New York, Australia

Postby EddieH » Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:50 am

I dunno. Could you do that with any recent film Elliotanimated?
What hasn't already been done before?
EddieH
 
Posts: 986
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 2:21 pm
Location: San Diego

Postby Elliotanimated » Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:01 am

Not a lot, it's true.
Perhaps Benjamin's theory is correct.
Elliotanimated
 
Posts: 3612
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: London, New York, Australia

Postby EddieH » Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:18 am

Check this lil Link out. It's actually quite funny and so true yet so many love those movies.
If people broke down movies that way, you wouldn't enjoy them as much eh..

http://forums.almaghrib.org/printthread.php?t=38267
EddieH
 
Posts: 986
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 2:21 pm
Location: San Diego

Postby Elliotanimated » Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:39 am

I'm all in favor of classic storytelling (just like in the link you posted - great stuff btw).
The examples given have similar plots, but thematically they all have their own point of view.
Darth Vader and Voldemort are both villains, but they're not the same villain.
Luke Skywalker and Harry Potter are both heroes, and they certainly have some things in common, but they're not the same character.
The heroes and villains in these films do not make the same choices as their "corresponding" characters, thereby setting themselves apart from other source material.
Star Wars and Harry Potter are not ultimately the same story.

Compare Avatar to Dances With Wolves (a useful comparison, I think).
With the exception of the alien world, what removes it from the story of Dances With Wolves?
Elliotanimated
 
Posts: 3612
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: London, New York, Australia

Postby Blue Pillow » Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:29 am

Elliotanimated wrote:At the risk of sounding argumentative (which I sure don't intend), can you point out 3 new and original things in the film?

Hmm. I admit this was hard to do, but here are three things that stood out to me.

1: Aliens who plug their pony-tail neuro-feeler thingies into animals' tentacles to create a mental and emotional bond was pretty original, to me at least.
2: Humans who tranfer their minds into genetically engineered alien bodies in order to inhabit a closed community on a foreign planet also felt fresh to me. Yeah, similar to Matrix, but quite different in that Avatar didn't use virtual reality, but real life. (Real within the story.)
3: Design-wise, I've never seen a pack of glowing-green eyed jungle dogs with black salamander skin, and certainly not any so believably portrayed.

Maybe I'll think of more, but I kinda doubt it. Most of the other cool things have already been seen in movies. Again, sheer originality isn't really what I look for in movies, so we're different that way.

And Moonman-- good call, Ridley Scott's sci-fi films are indeed near perfect. But for me, Avatar has a sense of fun and heart that those others do not. I can't say one's better than the other. All I know is I enjoyed Avatar a LOT! :)
Blue Pillow
 
Posts: 668
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2002 10:29 am
Location: Los Angeles

Postby Moonman » Wed Jan 06, 2010 5:09 pm

EddieH wrote:I dunno. Could you do that with any recent film Elliotanimated?
What hasn't already been done before?


Let the Right One In
Image
Moonman
 
Posts: 1531
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 12:14 pm
Location: Manteca, CA...still the middle of nowhere

Postby Captain Genius » Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:48 pm

Just saw it.
I liked it.
The 3d didn't give me a headache like My Bloody Valentine did.
Captain Genius
Moderator
 
Posts: 4623
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2001 10:27 pm

Postby drugmassacre » Thu Jan 07, 2010 12:19 pm

This movie is original in that it's not part of a franchise, or adapted from any source material.

The fact that it is original in THAt sense is what I think Eddie is talking about.

I agree with pretty much everything he and phil had to say.

i'm looking forward to my third screening of it
drugmassacre
 
Posts: 5609
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 3:01 pm
Location: Burbank, CA

Postby bangalore_monkey » Thu Jan 07, 2010 1:16 pm

hahaha

Image
Image
bangalore_monkey
 
Posts: 3262
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 7:36 am
Location: ohio

Postby dr.hong » Thu Jan 07, 2010 4:58 pm

I have to admit - I was looking at my watch 2/3 into it.

I guess I'm gettin' old and pretty pictures just don't do it for me anymore. :(
Image Image
dr.hong
 
Posts: 758
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 6:23 am
Location: city of angels

Postby EddieH » Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:33 pm

The 2007 Scriptment.
A lot of GOOD stuff that didn't make it into the movie. Hoping it does on the Directors Cut.

http://www.foxscreenings.com/media/pdf/JamesCameronAVATAR.pdf
EddieH
 
Posts: 986
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 2:21 pm
Location: San Diego

Postby Elliotanimated » Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:36 pm

I'm going to give this a look.

The film does seem to be missing some chunks.
I imagine there's some more stuff with the uptight nerd avatar guy and surely some more stuff with Jake reporting to Quidditch (Quarritch, Quarch?).
Elliotanimated
 
Posts: 3612
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: London, New York, Australia

Postby She-Thing » Fri Jan 08, 2010 8:35 pm

Ok so finally seen it-- (sorry if you've heard this for the millionth time haven't read the other comments for spoilers............)



It is a nice movie, but still... there were many features in this film, key points, which will make it forgettable.

The story- we all now why... if we take Edward Scissorhands for example, we know it's an idea taken from Frankestein, but still there are many differences, plus you can't resist the charming of it- beautifully appealing for its simplicity. In Avatar I hardly cared for anyone, except for the girl (can't remember her name) and Grace. Even though I found the acting of the girl amazing (also loved her accent/voice), she just stood there snarling and smiling, because noone, from my POV, reacted to her in an original, appealing way. (Porbably all this CGI, constantly artificial visuals didn't help either) Everyone, except those two girls, felt empty as if I was eating a chocolate bar for the 1000th time in a day. I know I'm eating it, I know it's delicious, but I can't taste it, because I'm so fed up of the same bar over and over again.


The natural habits- this whole civilization with their traditions and everything, is very different to the man. Unlike us, they know how to keep contact with nature, they respect animals, etc. But when the true moment, the synchronization of Jake and the girl comes, they just kiss. (I even could see the same colours as the Lion King's "Can you feel the love tonight") Call me evil, but I was expecting something else in that and many other moments, with all that ingeniously designed nature.

The music- I think this is the most that let me down. WAY down. All tribal choruses stuck with super glue were very disturbing- not just because of their random moments, but the unoriginality. From time to time they reminded me when little Sid-girls are praising Sid in Ice Age 2. What's worse, the movie ended with the most common, vulgar female voice you can think of.

Extra stuff: Small butts on the avatars put me a bit on my nerves. Made me feel the body fell into pieces except the head.
This is more of personal thing, but I don't get why, to synchronize with animals, having a tail, they had to use their hair, the least part of the body we have contact with.
Didn't like the panther/wolves, many moments CGI looked like PSP and some other stuff, BUT all the avatar nature was so amazing that I didn't really care.


Actually, I think all the praise Cameron is receiving is due to all the people who created Pandora (yay I remembered a name) and nothing else.


P.S: I won't count the 3D because I don't know what it is like around the world, but my movie theater's dreadful. Only for time to time there were parts which looked like holograms, but that was about it. I paid 9? glasses for nothing.
Image
She-Thing
 
Posts: 533
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Spain

PreviousNext

Return to Movies & TV

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests