by Cagliostro » Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:50 am
I'm not making a scientifically accurate statement, I'm just saying that a film which is being hyped up as revolutionary, looks like it has the sensibilities of a videogame cut scene, the very same cut scenes which will undoubtedly improve exponentially in terms of technical gloss. Point being, there is nothing revolutionary about Avatar at all, I can say with absolute confidence that the next gen consoles will be technically more impressive, can I say the same about next gen gameplay? No. The films of today are technically better than the films of 10 years ago, are they much better films? No. Tech heads get excited about Avatar, fair enough, but people who like story, narrative and compelling characters don't know what the fuss is about. It's a tech demo which happens to use linear narrative to demonstrate it's bells and whistles. Please tell me what I'm missing here, am I just blind to the Cohen brothers style character detail which will be revealed through more clips and screenshots?