The DrawingBoard

by **Elliotanimated** » Mon Mar 16, 2009 11:56 am

Who knows?

He's probably not supposed to look like a boring cock-head with a carrot up his date, but he does.

by **siskavard** » Mon Mar 16, 2009 11:11 pm

Since when were Disney princes interesting characters?

by **che-che** » Tue Mar 17, 2009 8:47 am

that bug, i think i have seen that guy before. nnnnnhyah hyah hyah!

by **jmad72** » Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:47 pm

The image posted by Lacey on page 6 looks great in comparison to the aintitcool.com link.

Like drugmassacre said, why would they release those images? They come off as half baked. I'm sure they have other material, as I get the feeling this is really rough preliminary art.

I'll wait to see more.

by **Gorgonzola** » Wed Mar 18, 2009 9:54 am

Eesh...it's like it's from a direct to dvd movie. Which is a shame then, because if character designs like that are gonna populate backgrounds like on the previous page, then damn. There's some sad difference.

by **She-Thing** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 3:44 am

Looks like $#it with hair

Sick.
Now that I see them both turned into frogs, probably ends like this

(you know, with all that originality slapped on the movie and stuff)

(scans from the book "The Frog Prince: Continued", by Jon Scieska & Steve Johnson, published in 1992)

by **dr.hong** » Sun May 10, 2009 12:35 pm

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6DmEgtibOg[/youtube]

I think it looks pretty good...... :wink:

by **Ashton** » Mon May 11, 2009 11:58 am

I'm not excited but Bolt surprised me by being good so I will give this a chance.

by **Elliotanimated** » Mon May 11, 2009 12:00 pm

1) The preview is actually kind of exciting.

2) I'm still not excited to see the film.

by **drugmassacre** » Mon May 11, 2009 12:51 pm

the more footage i see of this film the less excited I get about it

It does have some outrageously gorgeous backgrounds though

by **Kelly Tindall** » Mon May 11, 2009 12:51 pm

If they would have skunked the voice-over it'd be kind of cool.

by **Elliotanimated** » Mon May 11, 2009 12:52 pm

Kelly Tindall wrote:If they would have skunked the voice-over it'd be kind of cool.

'Splain to me please.
I'm foreign.

by **Kelly Tindall** » Mon May 11, 2009 12:57 pm

In the tradition of beloved history 75 years all that. I didn't like it when Pixar pulled it on the first Wall-E trailer, it seems a little desperate. I see where they're going (it's like this other stuff you liked!) but they aren't selling the cool stuff.

I guess I shouldn't complain, they aren't having a creepy digital Walt Disney introducing their trailers yet.

by **Ashton** » Mon May 11, 2009 10:26 pm

Be nice, if it weren't for all that, I would never have known Disney has made other films before.

How come the princess is scared that the frog can talk, but not that the frog has eyes on the top of his head, instead of where frog eyes can usually be found? Or that he has teeth? A toothy frog would be terrifying.

by **jmad72** » Tue May 12, 2009 7:53 am

Not bad. I'm not against it yet.

It has not gone against anything of the known Disney "house style". Whether it is story/art. It has the Disney flourish amongst the subtle "style" changes.

The design, of what I believe to be the films antagonist is interesting,.

The comedic timing is on point.

No problems for me right now.

The DrawingBoard

Disney's "The Princess And The Frog" - First Conce

Who is online